Monday, November 24, 2008

significant

Children should be reported to the Department of Community Services only if they are at risk of significant harm and the report should be investigated only if it is urgent or the child is young, former judge James Wood has recommended.
At what point does harm to a child become significant harm? What harm is not significant? Or insignificant? Strange wording. When is the investigation of the risk of significant harm not urgent? And at what age is a child no longer young? So many questions in so few words. Maybe that is why Wood is a former judge.

No comments: